I must admit, while I was never the typical little girl
growing up (I preferred my computer games and books to makeup and shopping), I
of course, dreamed of the idea of being able to have whatever I wanted, when I
wanted. Growing up, up until I was eight years old, it was just my single
mother and me. She worked hard so that we could have a little bit of extra
spending money for things like gymnastics lessons for me (that lasted about three
months) or dance lessons (that one lasted almost a year), or whatever I decided
I wanted to pursue for the month. There’s always been something somewhat romantic
about the idea of going from a poor situation to one where everything you could
ever want is at your fingertips (whether it be through marriage or magic).
Apologies for the blurry photo, but a picture of tiny me (in orange) at a gymnastics birthday party |
I must admit, I had never seen Pretty Woman until it was required for this week’s blogpost. I kind
of adored it. It was simple, sweet, and the quintessential “Cinderella” story. The
one thing that most people equate with a “Cinderella” story is the idea of rags
to riches (usually through marriage or magic).
And certainly, Cinderella and
Vivian (our street-smart protagonist of Pretty
Woman), achieve their riches through marriage. But how realistic is that exactly?
As much as many women like to pretend it’s possible, when considering today’s
culture and perspective on things such as prostitution, it just does not seem
feasible.
I really enjoyed Pretty Woman I did. But I have a
feeling, if you were to ask a millennial (female more likely) their perception
of the film, they would take a very feminist perspective when criticizing both
Vivian and Edward, our Prince Charming. Their top argument against the film is
that it would be unrealistic and portrays women as hookers, when women should
be aiming for better jobs and more equality.
Acceptable? Pic from abovethelaw.com (there was a lawsuit!) |
What I find poignant from Pretty Woman, and the sequel to Disney’s
Cinderella, is that both women want
to do more with their lives. Vivian wants to go back and finish high school and
do more with her life. While the original Cinderella
from Disney does not show much, in Cinderella
II she is shown not quite as the delicate, compliant woman that the Prince
marries. Instead, she is shown going out and about in the town, solving
problems for various townspeople (including her own stepsister).
Over the years, there has been many, many variations- all sorts of "A Cinderella Story" movie sagas, and I absolutely loved every variation of them- because truly, the underdog wins out and it's the ultimate "rise tale". And of course, being the huge fan of Walt Disney World that I am, a picture of Cinderella's Castle and I was a must add to this blog post!
Photo credit: My sister, otherwise she would be angry :) |
One last thing before I finish my
rant- Disney’s Cinderella is
certainly frowned upon by much of the current culture and community for not “having
a backbone”, being too submissive, and the like- I never got that perception.
What I saw was a young woman that had lost both her mother and father and was
thrust into a terrible situation, but still tried to make the best of it. Cinderella
worked to keep a calm, collected persona as much as possible. She was kind. And
the message I received from that was that as long as you tried to be calm,
collected, and kind, good things would come your way, no matter what else you
encountered along the way.
No comments:
Post a Comment